Picture Ratings – Lindys Graphics http://lindysgraphics.net/ Sat, 19 Jun 2021 02:50:09 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.2 http://lindysgraphics.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/liindys-graphics-icon-150x150.png Picture Ratings – Lindys Graphics http://lindysgraphics.net/ 32 32 Amazon’s Open Secret – The New York Times http://lindysgraphics.net/amazons-open-secret-the-new-york-times/ Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:18:39 +0000 http://lindysgraphics.net/amazons-open-secret-the-new-york-times/

This article is part of the Technology newsletter. You can register here to receive it during the week.

This week, Amazon acknowledged the reality: it has a problem with fake reviews.

The problem is that Amazon sharp blame in almost everyone involved in untrustworthy ratings, and not enough in the company itself. Amazon criticized Facebook, but it failed to acknowledge that the two companies share an underlying problem that risks eroding people’s trust in their services: an inability to effectively control their sprawling websites.

Learning from the masses is a failed promise of the digital age. It can be wonderful to evaluate the reviews of others before purchasing a product, booking a hotel, or seeing a doctor. But it is so common and lucrative for companies and services of to pay for or otherwise manipulate notes on all kinds of websites everything we see is hard to trust.

The persistence of fake reviews raises two big questions for Amazon: How much attention does it really devote to stopping fake customer reviews? And would buyers be better off if Amazon reassessed its essence as an online bazaar (almost) anything goes?

from amazon rules ban companies from offering people money or other incentives for reviews. Amazon says it catches most of the bogus reviews and works to stay ahead of rule breakers. Yet the global notice fraud industry actively works on Amazon and everyone knows it.

Amazon appears to have been pushed by the Federal Trade Commission, according to Vox’s Recode publication, and by journalists to take action to crack down on manipulated ratings.

According to a columnist for the Wall Street Journal wrote this week about buying a RAVPower electric charger along with a postcard offering a $ 35 gift card in exchange for a review, the seller mentionned Thursday that he had been banned from Amazon. (The statement is in Chinese, and I read it through Google Translate.) This followed the ban of several other big sellers who appeared to have bought reviews for years.

If government lawyers and newspaper columnists spot salespeople openly manipulating reviews, how well is the company looking for them?

Maybe you think this is how the world works: Caveat emptor. When I read product reviews on Amazon or doctors on Zocdoc, the reviews are helpful but I take it with a grain of salt.

But unfortunately, a lot of people are hurt by fake reviews, and they aren’t always easy for us to spot. The Washington Post recently wrote about a family duped by bought Google reviews for alcohol addiction treatment center. I wrote about research last year that found Amazon grabs a lot of bought reviews, but only months later and after buyers showed signs of feeling misled into purchasing a product.

I wish Amazon would take more responsibility for the issue. In its statement this week, the company blamed social media companies and poor enforcement by regulators for false reviews. Amazon is right. Fraudulent online reviews are big business with many enablers. Facebook and the WeChat app in China don’t do enough about forums where companies coordinate the handling of reviews.

But Amazon hasn’t said much about what it could do differently. For example, researchers at the University of California with whom I spoke last fall found that purchase notices were much more common among Chinese sellers and for products where many sellers were selling a product almost identical. Maybe that means Amazon should monitor China-based sellers more closely? Or that it would be useful to limit the number of sellers who list the same bathroom cart?

Positive reviews also help sellers appear prominently when we search for products on Amazon, which creates a huge financial incentive to cheat. Should Amazon reconsider how it counts ratings in search results? The company didn’t say anything.

Above all, it’s disappointing that Amazon doesn’t recognize that fake reviews are the result of its choice to go for quantity over quality.

People can buy almost anything on Amazon and from almost any seller. This can be great for buyers, but it delivered with compromise. Being a store of everything – and one that tries to operate with as little human intervention as possible – it’s harder for Amazon to root out. counterfeit or dangerous products and purchased reviews.

  • No more “speed filter”. NPR reports that Snapchat will phase out an app feature that allows people to record and share how fast they drive. Road safety advocates say the feature has for years encouraged young people to drive recklessly to gain bragging rights.

  • Use WhatsApp to Bust Myths: During the pandemic, rural India government health workers used WhatsApp to counter disinformation about the virus, The Verge reports. It takes a long time for health workers to verify information on the app, but online messages as well as in-person conversations seem to protect many people.

  • WATCH THE GIANT RABBIT: My colleague Amanda Hess has spoken to people who post videos online of their many exotic animals. The doghouse called Pet Tube responds to our love for visual gags like a bunch of snakes sliding across a piano, but these people also love animals – “even potentially revolting animal swarms,” ​​Amanda wrote.

A baby seal tests the water. The little one goes from uncertainty to joy in a flash.

We want to hear from you. Let us know what you think of this newsletter and what else you would like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you haven’t already received this newsletter in your inbox, please register here. You can also read past columns on technology.

Source link

Vaccinations and rain can revive Indian auto industry | Company | Economic and financial news from a German point of view | DW http://lindysgraphics.net/vaccinations-and-rain-can-revive-indian-auto-industry-company-economic-and-financial-news-from-a-german-point-of-view-dw/ Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:24:51 +0000 http://lindysgraphics.net/vaccinations-and-rain-can-revive-indian-auto-industry-company-economic-and-financial-news-from-a-german-point-of-view-dw/

India’s auto sector has been facing problems since 2018. New, stricter emission standards and the first wave of COVID-19 in 2020 have exacerbated the industry’s problems.

The sector, which contributes 7.1% of India’s gross domestic product (GDP), was once again pushed back into the slow lane by the second wave of the coronavirus, as May 2021 sales fell to significantly low levels.

As the rating agency Care Ratings recently reported, “During the month, factory shipments of passenger vehicles and two-wheelers contracted to a third of the previous month’s level, while the three- wheels achieved negligible sales of around 1,200 units ”.

The top five players in the commercial vehicle industry reported cumulative sales at nearly half of the previous month’s levels. Tractor sales fell 12%.

Monsoons to the rescue?

In its note, Care Ratings referred to three scenarios in which it linked the pace of the sector’s recovery to the speed at which the COVID-19 vaccination campaign was carried out in the country.

The report assumes that if vaccinations continue at the current rate of 2.5 million people per day, then it will take 336 days for the government to vaccinate 60% of the population with a first dose.

But with the danger of a possible third wave looming, states may not be able to start opening up the economy. This could eventually trigger constraints on the supply side and auto dealers will not serve customers at full capacity for the rest of the year.

Still, normal monsoons will help boost demand for tractors and two-wheelers, but schools and colleges will continue to close until at least September 2021. In the meantime, consumers seem to prefer to save money and avoid discretionary spending on items like automobiles.

Traffic jams in India can create chaos, but automakers hope demand for vehicles will rise soon

The other two scenarios

The second scenario assumes that there could be a vaccine shortage and that a deadly third wave could hit the economy.

If only 1.8 to 2 million people are vaccinated per day, then it will take 14 to 15 months for the country to vaccinate 60% of the population with the first dose. The number of cases will increase in rural areas, affecting their ability to purchase tractors and two-wheelers.

The third scenario is an optimistic approach and assumes that the country is able to immunize 3 million people per day. That would mean vaccinating 60% of the population with the first dose in just nine months.

This scenario also assumes an improvement in bank financing, accompanied by a recovery in consumption and private investment. Infrastructure activities would develop and stimulate sales of commercial vehicles. Discretionary consumer spending would improve and the lockdowns would be lifted. Unemployment rates would fall simultaneously.

It also assumes a gradual improvement in supply and demand with adequate and timely monsoons that will lead to improved rural agricultural income.

Looking at the larger picture

However, the Company of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM) says the data for May does not paint the big picture.

Rajesh Menon, chief executive of SIAM, said in a press release, “most of May has been stranded in many states, impacting overall sales and production. As May 2020 and May 2021 were abnormal months due to the COVID-19 situation and lockdowns, comparing these two months makes no sense. “

Commenting on the impact of the second wave, Vinkesh Gulati, president of the Federation of Automobile Dealers Associations (FADA), said that “the second wave of COVID has devastated the whole country because there may not be a only household that was not affected. . Outside of urban markets, this time even rural areas have been hit hard. “

Bosch Ltd employees in Bangalore

Government incentives could play a decisive role in reviving India’s automotive sector

Government action is coming

The National Investment Promotion and Facilitation Agency estimates India’s auto industry is currently valued at $ 118 billion (€ 97 billion). By 2026, it is expected to be the world’s third largest automotive market in terms of volume, reaching around $ 300 billion by then.

Experts believe that in addition to the vaccination campaign and the good monsoon, the Indian government has made decisions that will help the sector to recover quickly.

For starters, the Indian government has offered production-related incentives that will total $ 7.5 billion over the next five years and encourage exports.

In the 2021-2022 budget, the government also introduced the voluntary vehicle scrapping policy, which will eventually boost demand for new vehicles by removing old and unsuitable vehicles that currently ply Indian roads. The Cabinet even earmarked $ 7.8 billion for the auto and auto components sector in production-related incentive programs under the Ministry of Heavy Industries.

Source link

What channel does GB News air on? When is Andrew Neil? Complete list of hosts and launch notes http://lindysgraphics.net/what-channel-does-gb-news-air-on-when-is-andrew-neil-complete-list-of-hosts-and-launch-notes/ Wed, 16 Jun 2021 15:33:03 +0000 http://lindysgraphics.net/what-channel-does-gb-news-air-on-when-is-andrew-neil-complete-list-of-hosts-and-launch-notes/

GB News launched on UK television this week with sizeable audience figures – despite technical difficulties.

Compared by some to the right-wing American network Fox News, the news channel promises to “denounce the growing promotion of the culture of cancellation.”

Register now to our daily newsletter

The newsletter i cut through the noise

It aims to focus on debate rather than continuous media coverage, and is led by seasoned broadcaster Andrew Neil.

GB News launched this week with Andrew Neil at the helm (GB News)

GB News launched this week with Andrew Neil at the helm (GB News)

What channel does GB News air on?

GB News is on Freeview 236 and Freesat on 216.

On Sky it’s on channel 515 and on Virgin Media it’s on channel 626.

You can also watch live on gbnews.uk

Who are the hosts of GB News and when is Andrew Neil present?

Former BBC political correspondent Andrew Neil is now the head of GB News.

He will host the channel’s flagship news and policy program, discussing current affairs and interviewing political figures. It is broadcast live from 8 p.m. to 9 p.m. every weekday evening.

Other big names who have joined GB News include:

– Apprentice winner and former candidate of the Brexit party Michelle dewberry present Dewbs & Co, which promises to be “shamelessly on the side of the unheard of”.

– Columnist and presenter of the Daily Mail Dan Wootton present Tonight live – “British news with a serious attitude”.

– Former Sky Sports broadcaster Kirsty gallacher presents the Great british breakfast, aimed at “giving you reasons to be happy”.

– Former BBC presenter Simon mccoy has a show with Alex Philips which promises a conversation on issues on the “tip of the tongue of the nation”.

– Scottish history presenter Neil Oliver to celebrate ‘best of Britain’ with his show Neil Oliver Live.

– Former ITV presenter Alastair stewart present Alastair Stewart and his friends, an analytical perspective on the latest stories of the week.

What are the GB News audience figures?

Although viewers complain about the sound and picture quality, GB News kicked off with big notes on Sunday evening (June 13).

The new channel saw a peak of more than 350,000 viewers on his first night, Media Mole reports.

And his first full day on the air averaged 74,100 views – nearly 78,000 from Sky News but not quite 138,400 from BBC News.

In response to complaints about poor sound and lighting, GB News said Wednesday (June 16th) that it had made “a number of improvements”.

What is the review of GB News?

GB News has already sparked controversy, with Ofcom receiving 373 complaints about Dan Wootton’s anti-lockout monologue.

Meanwhile, advertisers have been encouraged to pull off the channel by the Stop Funding Hate campaign group.

Among them, Swedish retailer Ikea said GB News was not aligning with its “humanistic values” and Octopus energy said it would only advertise if the channel was “genuinely balanced”.

GB News has been criticized for its lack of balance – with debates sparking “anti-awakening” culture wars and questionable statements that go unchallenged.

GB News will broadcast seven days a week across the UK and Ireland.

A message from the editor:

Thank you for reading this article. We depend on your support more than ever, as the change in consumption habits caused by the coronavirus is having an impact on our advertisers.

If you haven’t already, consider supporting our trusted and verified journalism by purchasing a digital subscription.

Source link

Paul Pogba the star as world champions starts with a victory http://lindysgraphics.net/paul-pogba-the-star-as-world-champions-starts-with-a-victory/ Tue, 15 Jun 2021 21:04:00 +0000 http://lindysgraphics.net/paul-pogba-the-star-as-world-champions-starts-with-a-victory/

France got its Euro 2020 campaign off to a good start with a victory over its German rivals in Munich.

But who were the stars of the Death Band clash and who struggled to win? John Percy take a look at the events of the evening.

France (4-3-3)

Hugo Lloris (Tottenham) 7

A quiet first half for Lloris, who had no stopping to make but was much busier in the second. Always alert and a reassuring presence, good in the air.

Benjamin Pavard (Bayern Munich) 7

Defensively comfortable and always available to help on offense too. A worrying moment after a dangerous collision in the second half with Gosens, appearing to be suffering from a concussion but remaining on the field.

Raphaël Varane (Real Madrid) 7

Varane’s reading of the game was excellent here, always appearing to be one step ahead of the German attack. Will be crucial at Euro 2020 for France

Presnel Kimpembe (Paris St-Germain) 8

A colossal performance from the middle half, which forms a strong defensive partnership and understanding with Varane. Simple but effective

Lucas Hernandez (Bayern Munich) 6

Still attacking lower left and providing the cross which embarrassed Hummels. Tested in the second half by Kimmich but responded well.

Paul Pogba (Man United) 8

Another of those dominant performances that he seems to find easier to produce for France. With a superb pass that led to the opener, he controlled most of the night. Man of the match.

Source link

What happened to Tonya? http://lindysgraphics.net/what-happened-to-tonya/ Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:38:09 +0000 http://lindysgraphics.net/what-happened-to-tonya/

The challenge Actor Tonya Cooley appeared in eight seasons of the debut MTV reality series. But during The ruins in 2009, she claimed that co-stars Kenny Santucci and Evan Starkman sexually assaulted her.

Tonya did not appear on The challenge since this season, then what happened to him?

Source link

Turkey vs Italy player ratings: Zeki Celik 5, Burak Yilmaz 6; Ciro Immobile 8, Lorenzo Insigne 8 http://lindysgraphics.net/turkey-vs-italy-player-ratings-zeki-celik-5-burak-yilmaz-6-ciro-immobile-8-lorenzo-insigne-8/ Sat, 12 Jun 2021 17:19:25 +0000 http://lindysgraphics.net/turkey-vs-italy-player-ratings-zeki-celik-5-burak-yilmaz-6-ciro-immobile-8-lorenzo-insigne-8/

NOTES FROM TURKEY: Ugurcan Cakir 5 – A reaction stoppage in the 22nd minute prevented a header from Chiellini but the goalkeeper could only watch his own defender deflect the ball into the goal for the first game. A sloppy pass then led to Insigne’s third which sealed the game for the group favorites. EPA

Zeki Celik 5 – The right-back appeared to handle the Italian stars well in the first half, but conceded too much space after the break which was important in a series of dangerous Italian attacks. EPA

Merih Demiral 5 – A nightmare start to the tournament for the center-back as he led a powerful Berardi cross into his own goal. EPA

Caglar Soyuncu 5 – Surrender after the break as constant pressure from Italy made the evening very difficult for the Turkish national team. Booked late. Pennsylvania

Umut Meras 6 – Meras defended well most of the time but was penalized in the second half as Berardi found flank space for the opener. PA

Okay Yokuslu 6 – Active in eliminating Italian attacks in the first half but tired as the game progressed. Finally replaced in the 65th minute. EPA

Kenan Karaman 5 – Karaman was active in his defensive duties while dealing with Insignia and Spinazzolla, but rarely offered anything in the future. PA

Ozan Tufan 5 – Worked hard in midfield but spent most of the game chasing after Italian possession without ever being able to grab the ball. AFP

Yusuf Yazici 5 – A calm game for Yazici who spent most of the first half helping the defense. Replaced at half-time by Cengiz Under. PA

Hakan Calhanoglu 6 – Showed quality glimpses with a few passes but Turkey’s attacks were too short in number. AFP

Burak Yilmaz 6 – The Turkish leader worked hard throughout the game and often drifted into the canals to make room. Overall, however, it was a frustrating night with little service. EPA

SUBS: Cengiz Under (Yazici, 45) 6 – Under’s pace provided more threat to Turkey and showed signs of lightness in very tight attacks. Reuters

Kaan Ayhan (Tufan, 65) 5 – Non-existent that night but he was not the only one who could not have influenced the match. Turkey’s game plan demanded too much of the team. Reuters

Irfan Kahveci (Yokuslu, 65) 5 – Did nothing to stop the bleeding as Italy continued to bombard the Turkish goal. PA

Halil Dervisoglu (Karaman, 76) N / R – Reserved for an unnecessary challenge on Barella. Not involved after its introduction. PA

ITALY NOTES: Gianluigi Donnarumma 6 – The 22-year-old could have installed a lounge chair for most of the game. AFP

Alessandro Florenzi 6 – A recent hamstring problem saw Florenzi replaced at halftime by Giovanni Di Lorenzo. EPA

Leonardo Bonucci 6 – The ball rarely reached Italy’s defensive third, which allowed Bonucci to press high and move the ball forward. Only two efforts on goal for Turkey in the 90 minutes meant the day at the office was easy for the defender. AFP

Giorgio Chiellini 7 – The veteran almost opened the scoring but his header was matched with a solid save from Ugurcan Cakir. A life-saving tackle ensured the shutout with Turkey’s best game chance in the last order. EPA

Leonardo Spinazzola 8 – A remarkable performer for Roberto Mancini’s side as Spinazzola was a constant threat down the left flank, finding space in the box and delivering dangerous crosses into the box. AFP

Jorginho 7 – Italy moved the ball well in midfield and Jorginho was the conductor of a high volume of attacks. The winner of the Champions League was right on opening night with a solid performance. AFP

Nicolo Barella 6 – Barella moved the ball with intention as the Italian midfielder dominated the game in the center before finding space on Turkey’s flanks. AFP

Manuel Locatelli 6 – Worked hard in midfield against a defensive setup from Turkey and kept the game running. Italy’s dominance was ultimately too much for Turkey, who replaced their three central midfield players for the 90 minutes. Pennsylvania

Domenico Berardi 8 – Sassuolo’s man played a big part in the tournament’s opening goal as Umut Meras deflected his cross into the Turkish goal. A constant threat, recording five key passes overnight. Getty

Ciro Immobile 8 – Immobile worked hard with limited chances for much of the game, but persistence paid off with Lazio hitman doubling Italy’s lead after a rebound in the 66th minute. The forward then cleverly found Insignia for Italy’s third goal after the goalkeeper gave up possession on the cheap. EPA

Lorenzo Insigne 8 – The Napoli winger should have done better in the first half by curling his effort away from inside the box, but threatened throughout the game, eventually getting his goal with a shot in finesse in the far corner. Reuters

SUBS: Giovanni Di Lorenzo (Florenzi, 45) 6 – Worked hard when introduced as nothing touched the right-back in the second half. AFP

Bryan Cristante (Locatelli, 74) N / R – Maintaining the dominant display of the midfielder during the introduction of Manuel Locatelli. Getty

Andrea Belotti (Immobile, 81) N / R – Aggressively pressed when brought in for Immobile. EPA

Federico Chiesa (Insignia, 81) N / R – A calm game but the game was long over by the time the young prospect from Juventus was introduced. EPA

Federico Bernardeschi (Berardi, 85) N / R – Lit for Berardi who looked like he had received a hit as he made his way to the bench. Pennsylvania

Source link

Top 10 Best Picture Oscar winners, ranked by Letterboxd http://lindysgraphics.net/top-10-best-picture-oscar-winners-ranked-by-letterboxd/ Sat, 12 Jun 2021 02:00:00 +0000 http://lindysgraphics.net/top-10-best-picture-oscar-winners-ranked-by-letterboxd/

The list of films that won the coveted Best Picture Oscar award is small and exclusive. Theoretically, these are the best films of each year dating back to the late 1920s, although a few years have had winners deemed controversial.

RELATED: 10 Best Image Winners Of All Time, Ranked According To IMDb

Many Letterboxd users are avid moviegoers who have seen many of these Best Picture winners. They gave these Oscar winners reviews with some of them being among the movies with the highest average rating on the website. The ones with the best middle marks come from a range of eras and genres.

ten Everything about Eve (4.3)

Margo Channing in All About Eve

Many of the former Best Picture winners who scored high on Letterboxd are considered true classics of decades past. Among them is All about Eve, which came out in 1950. At the time, the 14 Oscar nominations he received were a record and he won six.

Among these nominations, four for actresses. The story follows a fan who makes her way through the life of a famous Broadway star. On Letterboxd, All about Eve Most received the perfect five-star rating (31%) but four stars followed closely (30%).

9 The Apartment (4.3)

Fast forward a decade, 1960s The apartment won the prestigious Best Picture Academy Award. Starring movie legends like Jack Lemmon and Shirley MacLaine, the film is an all-time movie despite the subject being somewhat controversial.

The film centers on an insurance clerk who allows senior colleagues to use his residence for their business in the hope that this will help him grow in the business. With the best film, he won the award for best director and best screenplay. 34% of reviews have it at five stars, while 28% are at four stars.

8 No country for old people (4.3)

Javier Bardem in No Country for Old Men

There is no doubt that the Coen brothers are among the greatest filmmakers in history. Their films are often well received immediately or become cult hits over time. 2007 There is no country for old people was one that was an instant sensation.

Both critical and commercial success, this crime thriller focuses on three characters. One is a veteran who finds a bag full of money, the other is a sheriff investigating and the other is a hitman to get the money. Five stars are returned 33% of the time for this modern classic.

7 The Silence Of The Lambs (4.3)

History was written in 1991 when Thesilenceofthelambs won the Oscar for Best Picture. It became the first (and remains the only) horror film to win the award. To add how impressive it was, the film also won Best Director, Best Actor, Best Actress, and Best Adapted Screenplay.

RELATED: 10 Best Horror Movies That Have Been Snubbed By The Oscars

The exceptional film remains an icon of the genre thanks to the work of Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins. The plot sees an FBI agent enlisting the aid of a cannibalistic murderer while hunting down another serial killer. Again, five stars is the most common rating (35%).

6 An overview of a cuckoo’s nest (4.3)

Jack Nicholson as Randle McMurphy in A Flight Over a Cuckoo's Nest

Jack Nicholson is one of Hollywood’s greatest actors for several reasons and one of them was his performance in Flight over a cuckoo’s nest. Released in 1975, what did this film do Thesilenceofthelambs years later, winning the five most important categories.

Among these victories was Nicholson as best actor. The film tells the story of a new participant in a mental institution who irritates his fellow patients to rebel against the system. Four-star reviews come in often (30%) but like most Best Picture winners, five stars are the most common (32%).

5 Schindler’s List (4.4)

Ralph Fiennes as Amon Goth in Schindler's List

You’d be hard pressed to find a powerful movie that Schindler’s list. Arrived at the cinema in 1993, this epic of Steven Spielberg blew the audience away as soon as they laid eyes on her. Set during World War II, it followed a German industrialist who worried about his Jewish workers.

Critics of Schindler’s list are overwhelmingly positive, hardly anyone gives it less than three stars, and a whopping 44% of users give it the perfect five stars. With Best Picture, it won awards for Best Original Music, Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay and three more.

4 The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (4.4)

Sam holding his sword and preparing to fight in The Lord of the Rings The Return of the King

2003 was a year in which a real story was written at the Oscars. The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King set a record sweeping the awards, winning all eleven Oscars for which it was nominated, with the two biggest being Best Picture and Best Director.

RELATED: 10 Film Franchises That Won Multiple Oscars

It remains the biggest Oscars sweep in history. This epic of Peter Jackson managed to conclude The Lord of the Rings trilogy in a way that was both true to the source material and a masterpiece of a movie. An incredible 46% of user reviews have five stars.

3 The Godfather Part 2 (4.5)

Michael grabs Fredo's face in The Godfather II

Only two sequels won the trophy for best film. Almost 30 years ago The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King achieved the feat, The Godfather II did. Directed again by Francis Ford Coppola, the 1974 drama is considered just as good, if not better, than the original.

The film functioned as both a sequel and a prequel, chronicling Vito and Michael Corleone’s journeys through the 1910s and 1950s, respectively. The middle part of this trilogy won six Oscars, including Best Director, and on Letterboxd, more than half of the ratings (53%) consider it perfect.

2 The Godfather (4.6)

The godfather Marlon Brando

In 1972, moviegoers discovered the world of the Corleone family between the 1940s and 1950s. Hollywood has seen many mafia films throughout history, but it has arguably never been better than The Godfather, which still stands decades later.

The film won three key Oscars, winning Best Actor and Best Adapted Screenplay as well as Best Picture. It is considered one of the greatest movies ever to be made and the scores reflect it, as 57% of critics gave it a five-star rating.

1 Parasite (4.6)

Parasites the Kim family sitting on their ground

Most of the top-rated Best Picture winners are those who made history. 2019 Parasite is one of them because it was the first and only non-English film to win the award for best film. Bong Joon-ho’s film is one of the most unique to be nominated for such major awards.

Telling the story of a poor Korean family who infiltrates a wealthy family by jostling each other in key roles in their lives, he delivered in terms of actor, staging and emotion. Parasite also won Best Director and Best Original Screenplay, and on Letterboxd it received five stars 57% of the time.

NEXT: Parasite And 9 Other Non-English Movies That Became Big Hits In America

A split image of Loki in his military uniform and a close-up of him in the MCU

Loki’s 10 best moments in the MCU movies

About the Author

Source link

Summary of the afternoon market of June 11, 2021 http://lindysgraphics.net/summary-of-the-afternoon-market-of-june-11-2021/ Fri, 11 Jun 2021 19:46:33 +0000 http://lindysgraphics.net/summary-of-the-afternoon-market-of-june-11-2021/

Corn, soybeans and wheat all pour into red Friday

The US EPA is looking for ways to provide relief to oil refiners who say they are under pressure because of current biofuel blending mandates. RIN credits are currently trading at record highs. Fears of loosening these mandates pushed grain prices up on Friday, especially soybean oil futures, which saw a limited decline. Soybean prices also fell 2%, as did nearby corn contracts. Wheat losses were variable, ranging from 0.4% to 1.9% after a turbulent session today.

Drought-affected areas of the Dakotas and western Iowa may continue to see some relief from the rains between today and Monday, with the latest NOAA 72-hour cumulative precipitation map predicting up to 1 “in some areas over the next three days. The agency’s 8-14 day outlook calls for a return to dry weather for the Midwest and Plains between June 18 and June 24, with warmer than normal temperatures also in the photo.

On Wall St., the Dow Jones slipped 36 points in the afternoon to 34,429. Investors remain cautious that inflation is moving at its fastest pace since 2008. “Memes stocks” were some. little recovered after suffering heavy losses yesterday. Energy prices were mixed. Crude oil rose 1.25% on optimistic demand, topping $ 71 a bushel. In contrast, gasoline and diesel each fell by around 1.25%. The US dollar strengthened moderately.

On Thursday, commodity funds were net buyers of corn (+10,000) and CBOT (+500) wheat contracts but net sellers of soybeans (-6,500), soybean meal (-4,000) and soybean oil (-2000).

At next week’s Farm Futures Business Summit, you’ll learn how traders manage risk through Technical Analysis, one of many learning sessions designed to help you build a smarter farm. We’re back live June 16-17 in Coralville, Iowa – Click here to find out more about the event and how to register.

Corn price faded by around 2% amid concerns over possible changes to the EPA’s biofuels mandate, which kicked off a series of technical sales and an overall choppy session today. July futures fell 14 cents to $ 6.85, September futures fell 8.5 cents to $ 6.2975.

Core corn offerings fell 4 cents at an Iowa processor on Friday, but were flat elsewhere in the central United States today.

IHS Markit Agribusiness has lowered its forecast for planting corn in the United States in 2021 from an estimate of 96.849 million acres in May to 96.539 million acres. That’s still significantly higher than the USDA’s March planting intentions report, which forecast 91.144 million acres. The agency will update this issue on June 30.

Yesterday, NOAA released a report expressing concerns about “expanding drought and heat” in the upper Midwest. D2 (severe drought) condition levels extend across parts of Michigan, Wisconsin, northern Illinois, Iowa, and Minnesota. “NOAA’s near-term outlook for June 18-24 calls for continued hot and dry conditions in the Midwest, which will continue to dry out soils and make drought problems persist or potentially worsen in the Upper Midwest. “, according to a press release from the agency.

The French agricultural office FranceAgriMer reports that 91% of the country’s corn harvest is classified in good to excellent condition until June 7, unchanged from a week ago.

If you missed yesterday’s big WASDE report from the USDA, which offered a wealth of new data on supply and demand, Click here for our exclusive coverage and analysis of what happened.

Preliminary volume estimates were 510,541 contracts, sliding slightly below Thursday’s final tally of 567,470.

Soybean price stumbled through a choppy session and closed with significant losses after a series of technical sells on Friday. July futures fell 35.75 cents to $ 15.0825, August futures fell 27.25 cents to $ 14.8275.

Base soybean bids fell 27 cents at one Ohio river terminal, while they fell 2 to 5 cents at three other Midwestern facilities on Friday.

IHS Markit Agribusiness increased its estimates for 2,021 acres of soybeans in the United States from 88.485 million acres in May to 89.065 million acres. That’s well above the USDA’s March estimate of 87.6 million acres – that number will be updated on June 30.

Is it worth a closer look to compare current soybean prices with the bull markets of 2012 and 2008? Naomi Blohm, Senior Market Advisor at Stewart Peterson, dug into data from the latest Ag Marketing IQ blog – Click here to learn more.

How are your crops doing so far this season? Click here to take our ongoing farmer survey on Crop Progress, which feeds into our weekly “Feedback From The Field” articles. This Google map, updated daily, displays all past responses for our readers.

And if you haven’t been there www.FarmFutures.com in a few days, our Friday feature, “7 Farming Stories You May Have Missed This Week,” is a good way to catch up quickly. The latest batch of content includes a possible GMO ban in Mexico, a Texas update on the battle against feral pigs, possible updates to the EPA’s controversial Waters of the US rule, and more. Click here to begin.

Preliminary volume estimates were for 313,673 contracts, slightly exceeding Thursday’s final tally of 302,247.

Wheat prices suffered moderate to large losses on Friday, with lowland rains in the near-term forecast triggering technical sales. September Chicago SRW futures fell 4.5 cents to $ 6.8525, September Kansas City HRW futures fell 4.5 cents to $ 6.44 as well, and wheat futures fell 4.5 cents to $ 6.44. September’s MGEX spring prices have eroded 16.75 cents to $ 7.65.

Following IKAR’s lead earlier this week, Russian consulting firm Sovecon raised its forecast for the country’s 2021 wheat production by 1.9% to 3.028 billion bushels, largely on the back of the improvement of the quality of harvests in the production regions of the south of the country. Russia is the world’s largest exporter of wheat.

In France, the grades of soft wheat have improved by one point to reach 81% of good to excellent conditions, according to the agricultural office FranceAgriMer. This is also a marked improvement over the same period a year ago when only 56% of the country’s soft wheat crop was classified in good to excellent condition.

A South Korean feed group bought 2.4 million bushels of wheat for feed from optional sources in a tender that closed earlier today. The grain is shipped between July and August.

Preliminary volume estimates were for 142,588 CBOT contracts, falling slightly below Thursday’s final tally of 199,061.

Get our best content delivered straight to your inbox every day. Click on here to subscribe to our morning and afternoon market newsletters.

Source link

If you had bought the shares of CARE Ratings (NSE: CARERATING) three years ago, you would have lost 58% http://lindysgraphics.net/if-you-had-bought-the-shares-of-care-ratings-nse-carerating-three-years-ago-you-would-have-lost-58/ Fri, 11 Jun 2021 01:11:55 +0000 http://lindysgraphics.net/if-you-had-bought-the-shares-of-care-ratings-nse-carerating-three-years-ago-you-would-have-lost-58/

CARE Ratings Limited (NSE: CARERATING) Shareholders should be happy to see the share price rise 26% in the last quarter. But in the last three years we’ve seen a pretty big drop. During this period, the share price fell 58%. So it’s good to see it come back up. While many would remain nervous, there could be further gains if the company can do its best.

Check out our latest analysis for CARE Ratings

To quote Buffett, “Ships will sail around the world but the Flat Earth Society will thrive. There will continue to be wide spreads between price and value in the market … ‘One way to look at how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between price. a company’s stock and earnings per share (EPS).

CARE Ratings has seen its EPS decline at a compound rate of 21% per annum over the past three years. This change in EPS is reasonably close to the average annual fall of 25% in the share price. So it appears that investors’ expectations for the company remain fairly stable, despite the disappointment. In this case, it looks like BPA is guiding the course of action.

The graph below illustrates the evolution of EPS over time (reveal the exact values ​​by clicking on the image).

NSEI: CARERATING Growth in earnings per share June 11, 2021

This free CARE Ratings’ interactive earnings, income and cash flow report is a great place to start if you want to delve deeper into the stock.

What about dividends?

When considering investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR incorporates the value of any discounted demerger or capital increase, as well as any dividend, based on the assumption that dividends are reinvested. It’s fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture of dividend paying stocks. In the case of CARE Ratings, it has a TSR of -52% for the past 3 years. This exceeds the return on its share price that we mentioned earlier. And there’s no price guessing that dividend payments are a big part of the reason for the discrepancy!

A different perspective

CARE Ratings shareholders achieved a total return of 47% during the year. But this yield is lower than the market. On the bright side, it’s still a gain, and it’s certainly better than the roughly 6% annual loss experienced for half a decade. So this could be a sign that the company has turned its fortune. While it is worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks, for example – CARE Ratings a 3 warning signs we think you should be aware.

We will like CARE Ratings better if we see large insider buys. In the meantime, watch this free list of growing companies with significant and recent insider buying.

Please note that the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market-weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on the IN exchanges.

When trading CARE Ratings or any other investment, use the platform seen by many as the professionals’ gateway to the global market, Interactive brokers. You get the cheapest * transactions in stocks, options, futures, forex, bonds and funds from around the world from one integrated account.

This Simply Wall St article is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell shares and does not take into account your goals or your financial situation. Our aim is to bring you long-term, targeted analysis based on fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not take into account the latest announcements from price sensitive companies or qualitative documents. Simply Wall St has no position in the mentioned stocks.
*Interactive Brokers Ranked Least Expensive Broker By StockBrokers.com Online Annual Review 2020

Do you have any feedback on this item? Are you worried about the content? Get in touch with us directly. You can also send an email to the editorial team (at) simplywallst.com.

Source link

Yes, the Oscar ratings will be abysmal. Here’s what really matters http://lindysgraphics.net/yes-the-oscar-ratings-will-be-abysmal-heres-what-really-matters/ Thu, 10 Jun 2021 04:50:10 +0000 http://lindysgraphics.net/yes-the-oscar-ratings-will-be-abysmal-heres-what-really-matters/

Whatever the year, producing the Oscars telecast can be a thankless job. No matter how you fool it, the show is over three hours of live television, essentially an endless succession of people reading lists and giving acceptance speeches. Start playing the winners halfway through to stick to the schedule and people complain; let the winners talk and people complain even more when the show goes on for a long time.

Illustration of an Oscar statuette being developed for Mary McNamara's 2021 Oscars essay. Credit: Adam Simpson / For The Times (Adam Simpson / For The Times)

© Provided by the LA Times
Illustration of an Oscar statuette being developed for Mary McNamara’s 2021 Oscars essay. Credit: Adam Simpson / For The Times (Adam Simpson / For The Times)

Over the years, some shows have been better, others worse, but I applaud everyone who agreed to take them on.

Mostly Steven Soderbergh, Stacey Sher and Jesse Collins, which produced the 93rd Academy Awards, the COVID Oscars.

The biggest question the Oscars faced last year was whether or not “Parasite” would become the first non-English speaker film to win Best Picture (he did, along with three other awards.)

This year there are so many questions it’s hard to know where to start. Let’s start with: who’s going to watch a show honoring a bunch of movies that most people haven’t seen because theaters have been closed for about a whole year?

Is “The Queen’s Gambit” or “Money Heist” nominated? Will “Tiger King” receive a special prize? Because while some in Hollywood wasted precious months at the start of the pandemic debate the release of films on streaming or VOD services when all theaters were closed would end cinema forever, that’s what we were watching.

To be fair, no one expects this year’s telecast to have anything but terrible notes. Even without the challenge of the coronavirus, the Oscars TV broadcast ratings have only gone down for the simple reason that it is broadcast on TV and the ratings for everything on broadcast TV does not. have done that down.

There is a chance that more people than expected will connect to crying Chadwick Boseman (nominated for “My Rainey’s Black Bottom”) or to see what an Oscar ceremony will look like at Union Station. But there’s an equal if not greater chance that, with COVID-19 restrictions starting to ease, many will decide the last thing they want to do is spend three more hours in front of a homescreen.

Bringing in Soderbergh is a daring gesture, guaranteed to increase the curiosity quotient. Will the entire show be shot with a handheld camera? Will he reunite (please God) Dianne Wiest, Meryl Streep and Candice Bergen? (If Soderbergh could shoot “Let Them All Talk” in two weeks, he really could do it in three hours.)

I’m a little worried about the lack of a host this year. The absence of a previously beloved comedian forced to make interstitial Brad Pitt jokes has definitely streamlined the last two TV shows. But after the year we’ve had, viewers may need more of a grip than usual. The mere presence of the Oscars definitely portends a return to normalcy, but it would be nice if a trusted character told us that things are going to be okay.

Maybe they could even get their second shot from Pfizer live, to reassure anxious vaccinees who might be watching. (Soderbergh could get one of those really big needles from “The Knick. “)

I am certainly worried about Soderbergh’s claim that this year’s ceremony is going to look like “a movie”.

I want to know more. Will it be a good movie? A potentially Oscar nominated film? Because with a better list of images like this year, the competition is pretty intense.

Or will it be some sort of “pictures found” situation that drags on quickly, causing viewers to wonder if a better way to honor the film on Sunday night? support these local theaters now open when seeing a real movie? Would it be a good thing or a bad thing if the Oscar ratings were low because people decided to go to the movies instead? (Speak among yourselves.)

Obviously, this year’s Oscar “movie” will have a star cast. But will they, say, have trouble making their way from the upper decks of this now capsized liner to cross the steel bottom in the hope of being saved? Because I’m telling you right now, not even Meryl Streep can match the pathos Ms. Shelley Winters conjured up in her “Poseidon Adventure“death scene.

I would be totally disappointed if this was a heist movie. Sandra Bullock, Cate Blanchett, Rhianna and the rest of “8 from the ocean“slipping enough ice that the folks at Harry Winston would regret not loaning out all those Oscar night diamonds. Especially if the caper could somehow involve Melissa McCarthy as an agent of the ‘Spy’ infiltration, even Soderbergh.

Maybe his installment will be a comedy – God knows, like most years, the list of top film contenders could use a bit of comedic relief. We know it won’t be a musical. The performances of the nominated musicians were entrusted to a 90 minutes beforeshow called “In the spotlight”, which I guess is supposed to make up for the lack of screaming fans on Hollywood Boulevard.

It will be interesting to see how the red carpet works at Union Station. If Jimmy Fallon was the host, he would definitely be taking him down to jump on a train as the doors closed right in the face of his pursuer, possibly Bryan Cranston. You can say that for the weird place: Movies that start with a train scene are usually pretty good.

Sadly, and I can’t be the first to notice, the Oscars telecast is not a movie. It’s a TV show with a lot of repetitive but essential ingredients. Lists have to be read, clips have to be shown, people have to give speeches, and no matter how much the producers beg, those speeches will veer wildly between the genuinely moving, the politically ostentatious and the always maddening “and I would like to thank every member. of my team ”ridiculous.

Soderbergh has a lot of experience with TV, so I’m not sure why he chose to insist that his Oscars will be a movie, especially when TV has so many user-friendly models to choose from (and I don’t even count the Emmys, the Grammys or, God forbid, the Golden Globes).

On the one hand, a 3.5-hour movie looks a lot like a season of “Chip bag, “and who doesn’t want another season of” Fleabag? “If Phoebe Waller-Bridge isn’t willing to help, then a reality show, with its sharp structure of conflict, truce, more conflict, direct on-camera speech makes more sense as a model than a movie.

Personally, I would go with a variety show approach, especially those old-fashioned Christmas specials. You know, like when Judy Garland sat at home soaking up while endless numbers of her famous friends “went out” to decorate the tree and sing a song. Only in place of Dean Martin (no one can really replace you, Dino!), It could be Joaquin Phoenix, and instead of sipping punch and singing “Silver Bells”, he would feature the supporting actor. (Although, honestly, I would sit around for three hours doing anything if there was any chance of Joaquin Phoenix sipping a little punch and singing “Silver Bells.”)

Then, as he stepped out, he could exchange a socially distant little joke with Laura Dern, who had just stopped by to present another award.

I have long thought that what the Oscars needed most was one of those special old Christmas boxes, with the cool sofa in the living room, the tall baby and that front door that all the guests through. enter. Especially this year, when until recently many of us were unable to cross any threshold other than ours. What better way to capture the mood to “open up”?

But that would only work if there was a host, and this year there isn’t. Because there are no hosts in the movies, except, of course, in “Parasite” (cue laughing Brendan Fraser gif.) On the other hand, after the year we’ve had, the sight of a bunch of movie stars in fancy clothes may be enough to hold our attention for the duration of “The Irishman,” and with or without a large audience, all the nominees did a very good job that deserves to be recognized.

More importantly, the people who will be honored on Sunday night have already achieved something that no other Oscar nominee group has ever achieved. In a time of international crisis, when so many of their colleagues worried about the box office, big screens and the threat of streaming services, they bravely maintained the film industry even when theaters were closed.

And it was definitely an Oscar-worthy performance.

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Continue reading

Source link